From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f117b5df4d: Add new functions eol and bol Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <166091536530.20326.14174671546998200051@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220819132245.AE2BBC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a680v004.fsf@gnus.org> <83r11ce3e3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16157"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Kangas , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 19 23:06:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oP9Bw-0003mI-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 23:06:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP9Bv-0004Lf-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP99U-0001HX-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:23760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP99S-0003iU-H2; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B7E0100142; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8736D100105; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1660943011; bh=L3mOYJRhQ6UmTwzeZoEC5HD+0fVeRmI6SvkMicMbCNw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Vx6eS8UdEgKBLxgK3faApVR+U6XLE4iA1rhQV6yOsh6Kwe5cjuwuOyXc7MN6p38hk 2F465zjhqmVIcBCeSWTTaILFaXzvYKYgnD+Xmg25Q6DWtRUd6ze51arCQNXuPOZPV+ ILH9qxMp0P4RTLdcAw1wldgmKYBeHsVfVxpyGwO8fpnqo/BH6KsWBXUZ9YAY8NkrjM MrziED9J+w7KpTu/4lNKl6fD6KyQPtosC0TwrVssR2AK/sHRST65qGNSHXLsa7rkdk fZp32+58QM2X07KzuZuM3QwcIZ0SVbsgpoyp5cZPSK2fNJeyBY3xLIM72+ggunYNLo mZoQcg+1UaqSQ== Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C98D1202BE; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83r11ce3e3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:04:04 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293649 Archived-At: > (IMO, it's confusing to talk about "point at SOMEWHERE" because that's > not how we use the term "point", except in the context of describing > point's position.) Agreed. If re-using `point-at-bol` is not an option, then I'd rather not have "point" in the name. Stefan