From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: State of VC? Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20080122164306.3B33C83045C@snark.thyrsus.com> <200801222207.m0MM7rlR014153@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200801240707.m0O77KcX018757@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87bq7bd2gi.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201316264 1977 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2008 02:57:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@gnuvola.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 26 03:58:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JIbF5-0005IB-I6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIbEf-0000VG-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIbEb-0000UT-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIbEa-0000UA-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIbEa-0000U1-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIbEW-0008Nb-DU; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:28 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAABcwmkfO+J95dGdsb2JhbACQKgEwnV1/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,253,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="13237434" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 21:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.159.121]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id GDF46827; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:27 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1255A858A; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:57:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87539 Archived-At: > The third argument to get-buffer-window really should not be optional, > to force people to think a bit more about the multi-frame case, which is > all too often ignored. > That is a good point, but I think such a change would break lots of > old code, and thus is a bad idea. Yes, I didn't mean to change it, I meant it as "the way things should be in an ideal world". Stefan