From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug trackers Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:00:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20080218052546.GK13020@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080218232829.GM5438@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080219232732.GC18902@jax.donarmstrong.com> <20080221014954.GF23349@rzlab.ucr.edu> <47C47E2A.2080501@gnu.org> <47C489EE.7080909@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204066952 11919 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 23:02:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Don Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 00:02:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU8om-0006lJ-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:02:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU8oG-00034X-3k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU8oC-00034S-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU8o9-00034C-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU8o9-000349-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JU8o5-0006vR-Id; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC062CF809; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFA73FE7; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:00:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1808D6CAA2; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:00:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <47C489EE.7080909@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:51:42 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.6, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_REPONSE 0.11, MC_TRANSFR 0.11) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90540 Archived-At: >> AFAIK the bug-tracker will only know into which discussion to place >> a reply if the reply is to a message that comes *from* the bugtracker, >> rather than merely being a reply to a message that the bugtracker has >> also received (i.e. I don't think debbugs will track Message-Ids in >> order to classify incoming replies). >> >> So people would/will need to subscribe to >> emacsbugs@lists.donarmstrong.com and discuss things there, instead of >> discussing them on bug-gnu-emacs. >> > OK, are we only talking about the test period here? Long term, I think we > should arrange for the emacs-bug and emacs-pretest-bug aliases to feed into > the bug tracker only, and all messages to subscribers should be sent by the > bugtracker with whatever identifying information it needs added to the > subject line. This will probably take some setting up to get right though, > so I can understand not wanting to deal with it now before we've decided > that debbugs meets our needs. Yes, this is the testing period. Stefan