From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `C-x n s' binding in org-mode Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87abheudss.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <28885A86-C4E6-4FDF-ACF5-32D93E5432C6@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214170571 24089 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2008 21:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Carsten Dominik Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 22 23:36:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAXF1-0003rf-SD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:36:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAXEC-0007aR-Mc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAXE7-0007ZG-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAXE5-0007XX-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39694 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAXE5-0007XJ-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:17366 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAXE1-0001ey-Fv; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:53 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0FAJ9iXkjO+KWv/2dsb2JhbACBWzKrPA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,686,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="23075683" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2008 17:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.165.175]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id CBF09352; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D189683BA; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:35:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <28885A86-C4E6-4FDF-ACF5-32D93E5432C6@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:15:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99720 Archived-At: >> The binding seems to make sense, although it's obviously not following >> the major mode binding conventions. > C-x n s seemed a logical key for this. I agree in the first sentence above, so I'm not going to argue any further. I'd just point out that maybe we should update the manual to indicate that `remap'ing may often be a beter choice, although in this specific instance it would either not be applicable (since C-x n s has no other binding currently) or require using another key (e.g. C-x n d). Stefan