From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:17:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwveiqnd95p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqg0ktic.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:11:39 +0900")
>> If you don't mind the size of the transient caused by the change, I think
>> the mandatory argument is the best design.
> I don't know how many of my colleagues at XEmacs and SXEmacs will
> agree, but I'd like to see that change.
That's actually very good to hear.
So, I'd suggest the following:
- mark interactive-p as obsolete.
- add a mandatory argument to called-interactively-p.
The next best solution is:
- mark interactive-p and called-interactively-p as obsolete.
- create a new function `invoked-interactively-p' with a mandatory argument.
I prefer the first because I think called-interactively-p is the
better name. But only the second preserves 100% backward compatibility.
This said, AFAIK called-interactively-p is not used in any Elisp package
other the ones bundled with Emacs, so I'm not sure this backward
compatibility issue is significant (which is why I prefer the first
option).
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-15 23:00 interactive-p and called-interactively-p Drew Adams
2009-08-16 5:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-16 13:29 ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-16 14:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-16 15:51 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-16 21:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-08-16 22:40 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-17 5:38 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-18 4:57 ` Richard Stallman
2009-08-18 7:08 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-29 21:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-31 22:21 ` Richard Stallman
2009-08-31 23:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-01 1:58 ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-01 5:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-01 21:20 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-01 23:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-03 13:48 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-03 14:11 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-03 21:17 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2009-09-04 1:21 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-04 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-04 3:04 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-04 4:44 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-03 16:27 MON KEY
2004-12-02 2:16 Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-03 3:41 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwveiqnd95p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).