From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Negative positions in frame parameters Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4BC48B3A.9060100@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271175609 8216 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2010 16:20:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 13 18:20:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1iqJ-0000wV-CM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:20:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O1iqF-0004WK-Cm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O1ihg-0001pK-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33737 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O1ihc-0000uP-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1ihQ-0007n7-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:35998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1ihP-0007n2-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o3DGAoHA022352; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B2467B43C0; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:10:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC48B3A.9060100@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv=22?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?'s?= message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:18:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3511=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123578 Archived-At: > Done. AFAIK, the Gtk-port has never handled negative positions in frame > parameters correctly. I've been using them forever on several of my special-display frames, so at least it made a good enough impression to fool me, Stefan