From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: attribute warn_unused_result Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D4B02EF.1080708@cs.ucla.edu> <7C616374-F2D6-4797-A66C-9C4D293B93B6@mit.edu> <4D4B20C5.1070100@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296853537 28738 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2011 21:05:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Chad Brown , Emacs-Devel devel To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 04 22:05:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSqQ-0002Pc-Kv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:05:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlSqP-0007yu-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46635 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlSqI-0007y2-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSqH-0006NG-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:36067 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSqG-0006N4-Bt; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:20 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAI/4S01MCqAf/2dsb2JhbAClLHS5UIVaBIR6jDCCbYM2 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,428,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="90618756" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-31.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.160.31]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Feb 2011 16:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B6241660DC; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:05:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D4B20C5.1070100@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:40:21 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135590 Archived-At: > I don't like ignore-value either. Shouldn't a cast to void be sufficient to tell gcc to not report a particular case? If so, there's no need to drag in gnulib's ignore_value. Stefan