From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs RPC security Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 21:35:46 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87d3kal0za.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5mky4o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v0hudzo.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcxsswox.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304382961 31616 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2011 00:36:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 00:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 02:35:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3aj-0004Rw-Ld for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 02:35:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55180 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3aj-0005sZ-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:35:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3ag-0005sJ-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3af-000347-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:35:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3af-000343-OB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:60990 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QH3af-0006aA-8a; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 32D4C66239; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:35:46 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <87vcxsswox.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 14:56:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139022 Archived-At: > I'm saying the problem is that server.el doesn't know if you're offering > services just to yourself or to others as well, so you can't say it's OK > to be less secure for personal use. server.el offers full service only. If you give access to it to someone else than yourself, it's your mistake, not server.el. Stefan