From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:26:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mxgem09k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E22AE2B.5040806@gmx.at> <4E248102.6080904@gmx.at> <4E380918.3060806@gmx.at> <4E397611.5020603@gmx.at> <4E3C13D4.9000707@gmx.at> <4E3D4592.40809@gmx.at> <4E3FA875.6020905@gmx.at> <4E412E5E.6030204@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312935680 26925 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 00:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 02:21:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqwXs-0001gZ-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 02:21:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqwXr-00076G-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqwXj-0006od-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqwXf-0007NV-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:5534 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqwXe-0007Dm-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:21:02 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjoFAJnOQU5FxKeo/2dsb2JhbAA6BianGXiBQAEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgAuHiDMYMVBJ9chDM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,347,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="130360309" Original-Received: from 69-196-167-168.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.167.168]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Aug 2011 20:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1346A6645F; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:26:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4E412E5E.6030204@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:55:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143079 Archived-At: > The difference was that I interpreted `pop-up-frames' non-nil as the > user's agreement to reuse a window on another frame. The same > interpretation is implicit whenever a user adds a buffer to > `special-display-regexps' making `special-display-popup-frame' search > all visible frames. For special-display-regexps it makes sense because those frames are marked dedicated. This said, his case is pretty unusual, AFAIK, so I'm not too worried about it: as long as the new setup lets him specify explicitly that he wants this, it's OK if the default does something else. >> It'll take me a while to change my setup to avoid dedicating windows, so >> don't hold your breath, > There's one thing that won't work for you: `bury-buffer' doesn't iconify > the frame but deletes it. I'd hate that (at least as much as Drew hates iconification). > Iconification would need some extra work. Hopefully I'll be up to it. Stefan