From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: threads and kill-buffer Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a9x55xvd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83d321dvsr.fsf@gnu.org> <87d320qqkp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83sjawckww.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346898514 20676 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2012 02:28:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 04:28:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Rpa-0005nM-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:28:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9RpW-0001sq-SS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37887) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9RpU-0001sl-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9RpU-0001j5-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:29260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9RpT-0001ik-2Z; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:27 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxINJ/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="197625048" Original-Received: from 69-196-131-73.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.131.73]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Sep 2012 22:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E8017AE2D9; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:28:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83sjawckww.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:46:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153085 Archived-At: >> I suppose we may also want a new predicate to detect this state. > At least internally, yes. Not sure we should expose that to Lisp. Can someone explain to me why don't want to make kill-buffer signal an error? Stefan