* About branches in bzr repository
@ 2013-02-03 14:24 Xue Fuqiao
2013-02-04 3:21 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Xue Fuqiao @ 2013-02-03 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
I have a question about branches in bzr repository: When will the emacs-23 branch be moved into `old-branches'? Or more generally, when will a branch be moved into `old-branches'?
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-03 14:24 About branches in bzr repository Xue Fuqiao
@ 2013-02-04 3:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-04 17:33 ` Glenn Morris
2013-02-04 23:54 ` Xue Fuqiao
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2013-02-04 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xue Fuqiao; +Cc: emacs-devel
> I have a question about branches in bzr repository: When will the emacs-23
> branch be moved into `old-branches'?
We could move it there, but it doesn't seem very important or useful.
> Or more generally, when will a branch be moved into `old-branches'?
old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
been incorporated in the trunk).
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-04 3:21 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2013-02-04 17:33 ` Glenn Morris
2013-02-04 19:26 ` joakim
2013-02-04 23:54 ` Xue Fuqiao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2013-02-04 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Xue Fuqiao, emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
> implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
> been incorporated in the trunk).
Seems like "imagemagick" should be in there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-04 17:33 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2013-02-04 19:26 ` joakim
2013-02-04 20:05 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: joakim @ 2013-02-04 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Xue Fuqiao, Stefan Monnier, emacs-devel
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
>> implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
>> been incorporated in the trunk).
>
> Seems like "imagemagick" should be in there.
>
Yes.
--
Joakim Verona
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-04 19:26 ` joakim
@ 2013-02-04 20:05 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2013-02-04 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joakim; +Cc: Xue Fuqiao, emacs-devel
>>> old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
>>> implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
>>> been incorporated in the trunk).
>> Seems like "imagemagick" should be in there.
> Yes.
Done,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-04 3:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-04 17:33 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2013-02-04 23:54 ` Xue Fuqiao
2013-02-05 3:27 ` Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Xue Fuqiao @ 2013-02-04 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:21:29 -0500
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> > I have a question about branches in bzr repository: When will the emacs-23
> > branch be moved into `old-branches'?
>
> We could move it there, but it doesn't seem very important or useful.
>
> > Or more generally, when will a branch be moved into `old-branches'?
>
> old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
> implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
> been incorporated in the trunk).
Thanks. But it seems that EMACS_21_1_RC, EMACS_22_BASE and EMACS_23_1_RC don't look like feature branches.
> Stefan
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About branches in bzr repository
2013-02-04 23:54 ` Xue Fuqiao
@ 2013-02-05 3:27 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2013-02-05 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xue Fuqiao; +Cc: emacs-devel
>> > I have a question about branches in bzr repository: When will the emacs-23
>> > branch be moved into `old-branches'?
>> We could move it there, but it doesn't seem very important or useful.
>> > Or more generally, when will a branch be moved into `old-branches'?
>> old-branches is usually for feature branches (i.e. branches that
>> implement a new feature) that have been merged (i.e. the feature has
>> been incorporated in the trunk).
> Thanks. But it seems that EMACS_21_1_RC, EMACS_22_BASE and EMACS_23_1_RC
> don't look like feature branches.
Indeed. `emacs-23' will probably follow them there at some point.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-05 3:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-03 14:24 About branches in bzr repository Xue Fuqiao
2013-02-04 3:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-04 17:33 ` Glenn Morris
2013-02-04 19:26 ` joakim
2013-02-04 20:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-04 23:54 ` Xue Fuqiao
2013-02-05 3:27 ` Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).