From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bad epg.el+GPG2 behavior: unavoidable passphrase pinentry prompt Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:59:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878uyg0yp1.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <878uyfzf1w.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87bo389lw0.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87y56cufkt.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y56b96uk.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87haczvlmr.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87bo36tpyt.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380913520 13832 80.91.229.3 (4 Oct 2013 19:05:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:05:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 04 21:05:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VSAgk-0003q6-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:05:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSAgj-0007jG-PI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:05:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSAg4-0006xd-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:04:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSAfx-0001MY-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:46174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSAfw-0001MK-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r94J4SSZ007812; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D7DCBB41F9; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:59:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bo36tpyt.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:59:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4721=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4721> : inlines <126> : streams <1050162> : uri <1555789> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163858 Archived-At: > OK, so there's no way to avoid the broken behavior in epg.el and any > fixes on the GnuPG side have to wait until a new release (and someone, > possibly you, has to ask Werner for that fix). Is that accurate? It Can you make a bug report about the problematic behavior (e.g. with your previously posted recipe), and move the discussion there? Stefan