From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: electric-pair-mode Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:13:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877gc1n9vb.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385082837 7706 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2013 01:13:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 01:13:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 22 02:14:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VjfJp-0005Kf-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:14:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36083 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjfJo-0002to-MX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:14:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjfJf-0002f7-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjfJW-0003mV-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:38115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjfJW-0003mJ-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:13:42 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KWN/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KWN/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="39292120" Original-Received: from 206-248-165-141.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([206.248.165.141]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Nov 2013 20:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2D6B8AE494; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:13:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877gc1n9vb.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:48:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165517 Archived-At: > No annoyance so far but I'm wondering why both `electric-pair-mode' and > `electric-indent-mode' are *global* minor modes. Because in my experience, most people who like those features, like them everywhere. > For example, in all kinds of lisp modes I'm using paredit which > provides both features, too, in a slightly different form. So there > I wouldn't want to activate these modes (although it seems having them > activated doesn't do any harm). Looks like there's no problem, then. Stefan