From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk emacs infelicity with linum mode Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zjeix7hg.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <838um1gar9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppfdyhpf.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <8361h5g7mv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjehw5cs.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <834mwog0u0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq9kd5y3.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <83oauve75i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409846242 13439 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 15:57:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Manoj Srivastava , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 04 17:57:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZPK-0006qM-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:57:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52120 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZPJ-0005Vu-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZOm-0005HE-0f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZOe-00006d-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:12083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZOU-0008VJ-G0; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([24.201.170.218]) by VL-VM-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NBD00IXPW9K5T00@VL-VM-MR002.ip.videotron.ca>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 290AE660C4; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:09 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <83oauve75i.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 24.201.245.36 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174012 Archived-At: > Also, I think linum-update-window should do nothing if 'linum' is not > a valid face on the selected frame, because functions in > window-configuration-change-hook can be called in many situations on > which linum has no control. This brings a new concept to me: how can a face be invalid in a specific frame? I thought a face either existed (globally) or not. It can have different "values" in different frames, but this is the first time I hear mention of a face being *invalid* in a particular frame while existing in other frames. I think it would be better if we can get rid of this subtlety. Stefan