From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:41:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171129233238.504B5204F1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <5d668ce5-1482-a3d4-c01b-7d996a532567@yandex.ru> <20171130214621.GA22157@ACM> <27985594-3bb4-ce88-8928-2ccfeac13eae@yandex.ru> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <1e542021-e389-cca4-6acd-349efddb2652@yandex.ru> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512232963 22606 195.159.176.226 (2 Dec 2017 16:42:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 16:42:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, spinuvit@gmail.com, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 02 17:42:39 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLAs7-0005R8-1o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:42:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLAsE-0001dp-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:42:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLArX-0001cz-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLArX-0003Du-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:41:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pmta21.teksavvy.com ([76.10.157.36]:6851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLArT-00035Z-Dy; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:41:55 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2H1CAAl1yJa/wx53mhWBR0BAQUBCwGDP?= =?us-ascii?q?IFUg1uLX44BAYF8NAGYYYU/BAIChSpEFAEBAQEBAQEBAQNoKIUkAQQBViMFCws?= =?us-ascii?q?0EhQYDSSKLQipOYpaAQEBAQYCASWMNYUVhgQFkxqPUpcOiX2HXJgHNiOBTTIaC?= =?us-ascii?q?DCCZIMGgWwjilQBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2H1CAAl1yJa/wx53mhWBR0BAQUBCwGDPIFUg1uLX44BAYF?= =?us-ascii?q?8NAGYYYU/BAIChSpEFAEBAQEBAQEBAQNoKIUkAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSKLQipO?= =?us-ascii?q?YpaAQEBAQYCASWMNYUVhgQFkxqPUpcOiX2HXJgHNiOBTTIaCDCCZIMGgWwjilQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,349,1508817600"; d="scan'208";a="10593474" Original-Received: from 104-222-121-12.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([104.222.121.12]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2017 11:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DA8BD61445; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:41:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:10:35 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 76.10.157.36 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220621 Archived-At: >> > IMO, C modes and Lisp modes must be supported well, before this lands >> > on master. >> Why? > Because Emacs is written in these 2 languages. Sorry, I thought that > was clear. So you'd rather see "no multi-major-mode support at all" than "multi-major-mode support for some major modes"? > It's too late for landing such features on emacs-26. Sorry, it will > have to wait until Emacs 27. Then we should urgently remove the prog-indentation-context business (i.e. revert to the Emacs-25 state of those features). Stefan