From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle case where `beg` and `end` are strings instead of markers Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 14:37:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k0b84tfr.fsf@occasionallycogent.com> <87h76c4ruf.fsf@occasionallycogent.com> <86sfpwwerz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87czh03xa9.fsf@occasionallycogent.com> <87o80i3frf.fsf@occasionallycogent.com> <8635htf7pr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37292"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: James N. V. Cash , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 01 20:40:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlEUx-0009Vj-TW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 20:40:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlEUw-0003Mx-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 14:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlESH-0001nl-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 14:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:6638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlESF-0003V5-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 14:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 566AC440313; Sun, 1 May 2022 14:37:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 270D0440CFA; Sun, 1 May 2022 14:37:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1651430277; bh=wblSiw26sNjs1QL0+GK3xiK5kues3cKWcZq83xkYiQI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=aR1oT1ixFsMDZAJdqvALnRh1XOEoBnn0Wm3N4MO1wgAkRKtDPy85DvDAXM5iYhBvK TlKwdkWUdcSQSFHDhFC96L41+evQYdVEQt4+tHcY66/4OGvPOwwdt+xDbTghDkW47r iExjrj5/TXLXCITVNjEFgW2TE2PrS4PB0qg1dno5PXBFlp6ReHYnVknMgInVGvzJzV hrHOgMRDrqqM2x9I29MJmEKgtq4Slrt68bx0v7mW25HcdpBds5fio3g5r9iBVsD22j tfpryfRCyVpK49Y+VkqzQv8KBaPNIgyeWFuzGH+gzW3I5fQ3o9XNP3WPA12FFBKsLF voKfAYfqX+P1Q== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7B66120263; Sun, 1 May 2022 14:37:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8635htf7pr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 01 May 2022 21:03:40 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289080 Archived-At: >> Maybe instead of strings, they should be functions, so CRM can set them >> to functions that first look for the separator and then search for some >> leading/trailing string? > Then while creating the *Completions* list it could return a lambda > to be called later after selecting one of the options. That's the idea, yes. Stefan