From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f2d2fe6fc8: server-execute: Initialize the *scratch* buffer Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 12:26:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <165162665935.26821.8964921720746152690@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220504011059.9F667C009A8@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87levhdfeh.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <87y1zhe5qz.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <87levhe24h.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2502"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 18:28:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmHrZ-0000Vv-45 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 18:28:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmHrX-00081d-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmHpn-000601-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 12:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmHpk-0007FP-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 12:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2C488441771; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EF532441489; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:26:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1651681592; bh=iOPJcnq/17lUsOpq71VPTXrNhyS7eCiFQ5bX6d7wzg8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kRRe6mSqdhzzZMSAjC0kzAyNZYr/yKIgdxww3xjTftg9Y2mbp9CYWtYJJM/X76HjT HKMOyxW+n0jSWG0jr8He/IJ9EuvWToydOe+DDzg11C6/fUIUJEJ36aNFJXSHA/aIRI 6nvl7210bN2A5uj/tfwSTYJN7qpLhYPsnhMZA3ZWjaKjS7LIETD7m2/ogSRIHirVSh d/sLiNeSbBB2kC0yQAZC5ecV1SrppFowcBg860nB5iqhpppazxxDLQKR4Eaks8wwk9 rvUAfv8eQ0BljBzEorG66u+JNX3QyZvLEiTLNYBECeYKUbq+PNPRB1RplSW6j80RkQ uVq5J+lob6r7w== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1998120175; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:26:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87levhe24h.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> (Sean Whitton's message of "Wed, 04 May 2022 08:41:50 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289192 Archived-At: > It looks like Fother_window is called only from Fcall_interactively and > Fkill_buffer, so there probably isn't a bootstrapping issue if I make > those Ffuncall my new `get-initial-buffer-create'. It looks like > bootstrapping C code just makes an empty *scratch* and leaves it to > startup.el to initialise it. Even better, Stefan