From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: add-hook and lambda functions Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:35:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <460D7012.6010608@gmail.com> <87ps6pgt5e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <460EF973.50406@gmail.com> <85k5wwo7v2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175452554 9317 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2007 18:35:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 01 20:35:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HY4u8-0002eR-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:35:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY4x4-0006yS-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY4x0-0006wh-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:38:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY4wy-0006v2-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:38:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY4wy-0006ux-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts40.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.97] helo=tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HY4tx-0000hM-9d; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.53.194.92]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070401183540.KSZN1624.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E1A2A7F3C; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:35:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <85k5wwo7v2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sun\, 01 Apr 2007 09\:45\:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68894 Archived-At: > I find it surprising to have turn-off-hideshow without a corresponding > turn-on-hideshow. Is the latter not expected to be used? I don't > know hideshow enough to give an educated guess. These are internal functions, not commands, so regularity is not particularly important. Stefan