From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: something like linum.el ought to be added Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86hcm4rw70.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190125908 16075 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2007 14:31:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, markus.triska@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 16:31:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXe6t-0005rg-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:31:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXe6r-0006E3-U6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXe6n-0006DP-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXe6l-0006Cn-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXe6l-0006Ca-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from x-132-204-253-66.xtpr.umontreal.ca ([132.204.253.66] helo=ceviche.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IXe6j-0008TT-Dd; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EF744B4127; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:31:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 17 Sep 2007 23\:30\:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79196 Archived-At: >> jit-lock is controlled by the `fontified' property. We do not want linum >> to alter text properties, so it can't use jit-lock. > I do not follow. > `jit-lock-function' is called from the hook `fontification-functions', > which is run from `handle_fontified_prop', which is called when > there is a change in the `fontified' property. So it seems that everything > is caontrolled by that property. > Did I misunderstand that code? No you have it right. But I don't think the conclusion follows from that. I don't have time right now to go into the details, Stefan