From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs.el Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8762sa9770.fsf@gmx.de> <87pqqibr30.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hcp1hok.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87d3mhcmyl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd09c5bw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sjvcqidp.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298648876 31901 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 15:47:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 16:47:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsztT-0004cz-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsztS-0007WH-JM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47432 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsztN-0007WB-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsztM-0002Wb-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:39427 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsztM-0002WT-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:40 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAIddZ01MCo5f/2dsb2JhbACmOnW9LYVgBIUQj14 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,225,1297054800"; d="scan'208";a="93535348" Original-Received: from 76-10-142-95.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.142.95]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Feb 2011 10:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 882EF660D6; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87sjvcqidp.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:49:22 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136514 Archived-At: > This is why I suggested the elpa.gnu.org files should simply be in a > subdirectory of the Emacs trunk but the maintainers preferred they be > separate. Maybe now, after a few months of offering elpa.gnu.org, it > can be reevaluated. There is no question that the ELPA archive should be in a different Bzr branch than Emacs. But we should encourage (e.g. by making it very easy) having both checkouts. Stefan