From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:02:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <532B3FFE.5020403@gmx.at> <838us46lsr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395407017 15638 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2014 13:03:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 21 14:03:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz6u-00081l-IO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:03:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz6u-0002tu-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz6R-0002OP-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz6K-0000DY-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:62680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz6C-0008WD-Ch; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:03:00 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOOGJZigV6DEw X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOOGJZigV6DEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="52849304" Original-Received: from 206-248-162-160.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.162.160]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2014 09:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5D83060202; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:02:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <838us46lsr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:41:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170710 Archived-At: >> No, if the "redisplay" bits are "false" we know that nothing has changed. > Are these bits reset for windows on iconified frames? Not sure what you mean by "reset", but no iconify&deiconify does not affect the `redisplay' bits. And it shouldn't, just like obscuring&deobscuring a frame doesn't. > If so, you have no other way but marking such frames "garbaged" when > they are deiconified. I highly doubt it. Stefan