From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] support a few of the new features of C++11 in syntax highlighting Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <536F1D36.6010307@gmail.com> <87ppjks3th.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lhu8rrtm.fsf@wanadoo.es> <20140511220947.GD2759@acm.acm> <87ha4wrle6.fsf@wanadoo.es> <20140514201353.GA4125@acm.acm> <20140516160743.GA3267@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400283772 10728 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2014 23:42:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 17 01:42:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WlRlz-0002sD-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 01:42:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlRly-0006nx-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlRlp-0006mx-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlRlg-0000jP-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:33 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:49522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlRlg-0000jL-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s4GNgJJL003559; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3847C601AD; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:42:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20140516160743.GA3267@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 16 May 2014 16:07:43 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4944=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4944> : inlines <881> : streams <1184930> : uri <1758944> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171896 Archived-At: >> >> What can I do about that? >> > OK. I suggest proceeding as follows. >> I'm curious: how did we get to this point? > We've never been anywhere else. CC Mode developement has always taken > place mainly in its own project at SourceForge. Right, this is not the part that bothers me. > Anyhow, stand alone CC Mode and that in Emacs have drifted apart to > the extent that any such synching would usually need manual effort (as > =D3scar will likely find out). That's the first part that worries me. The second is that this new C++11 branch seems to be based on the standalone branch rather than the Emacs branch. Am I reading too much into it or do you consider the standalone branch as "the main branch"? Stefan