From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:04:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <54193A70.9020901@member.fsf.org> <837g0ptnlj.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3yxwdr6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tx3tmi3t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834mvttgsf.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhp5m99w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9ztm5oa.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87d2ahm3nw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tqneyvl.fsf@netris.org> <87d2a54t1m.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <83lhotme1e.fsf@gnu.org> <871tql17uw.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <838uktm9gw.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnpoerbs.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412643930 29915 80.91.229.3 (7 Oct 2014 01:05:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 01:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , stephen@xemacs.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 07 03:05:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbJDM-0008G1-SW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 03:05:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbJDM-0002UC-9p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbJDC-0002Tr-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbJD4-0006kM-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:60652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbJCo-0006fP-Ml; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:04:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFxKjo/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBVhgLBQsLNBIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFxKjo/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBVhgLBQsLNBIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="91842625" Original-Received: from 69-196-168-232.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.168.232]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Oct 2014 21:04:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 11F4785DF; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 21:04:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bnpoerbs.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:00:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175061 Archived-At: > I think this is false. This discussion, initiated by Richard, is about > how Guile can adapt itself to better meet the needs of Emacs. If the > discussion happens where very few Emacs users/developers are present, > then I don't see how it can be useful. I understand you want Emacs developers to participate. But I don't want Emacs's mailing list to be drowned any more than it already is. Stefan PS: Also I don't see why this discussion is useful at all. It's just people arguing about opinions, which I can't imagine you need any more of. If you need to know how Emacs works, just ask us.