From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> <83d07984ux.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0l6kgd.fsf@gnu.org> <831rnn7qna.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="45306"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, joostkremers@fastmail.fm, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, pcr910303@icloud.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 13 20:36:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYwEy-000BgO-La for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:36:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYwEx-000807-Na for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:36:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYwEU-0007Wi-5x for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:52932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYwES-00063L-LY; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8182744FF42; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2026444E19D; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1589394949; bh=gZ+rQCoc+RmStrYTE9ZX2ij3xbgJScSAydMwnWhP0pc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Qhbi71+x1ngkptVesYwrZnOfcAsSwEyKCgznjZUro850zhm8n2cyP8VZUo7Lvf15v 9rNbNTcRu9fOlVAbdMOY7c+2RgrMJoe2/ztSSVJNoLxALmpphJlm04d+Up0Vlt5tU8 l/QAFPbgEqvAp2md+CRZsIqEhiBD0XGf9CXrNblnnZmEL2e5bcSL6wcQX7BVAhFztx nPHm8eOz56uxmK4R9KXNxqVBEOm/spWIoUJm4ePdipUWUCzVq592oXNMLIifN65FAv W5NujUJ75LW/ym9tMDV0PfZnHsMyJ6Zku3MxQJ8zgOoPCH4YjNWar3U+hj1HsqOUFN yUc9fulWXoU2Q== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B322D120779; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:35:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <831rnn7qna.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 19:20:41 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/13 14:35:50 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250156 Archived-At: >> > Do we have a mechanism to declare that a package is not intended to be >> > brought into core, unless changed to follow the same standards and >> > guidelines as the core does? >> Being a GNU ELPA package does not mean "intends to be brought into core". >> Never has, never will. > Others seem to think otherwise. Then they should look at what GNU ELPA contains. Stefan