From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: Automatic setup for bug-reference-mode Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r1uihtsu.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7vd3cbs.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuzdsj8d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="118434"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 14 20:41:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkXZI-000UkQ-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:41:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48090 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkXZH-0003On-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:41:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkXYV-0001jP-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:55470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkXYT-0001J1-BJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 02CF744019E; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2C0D440167; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1592160025; bh=no5ua2da8hA+kzSOVqm7FL9w4rLXOV64AIbAbKxqbSk=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nLYoKxerdpthacj4jSpPS+yT6zcfAyj3BI6fwoI8enO5DikB6zeBfp79mtNDoTyLu En+1YL5UWD2o7sIjJkJgo9r1U7IbA1XkScUHXfRsDG88Gx49N5oUGfvqOj/pfs0YMP WaOAokS6Z1FpC6VuO6KRZ5+W9NbZhLq8ZVRHEXZSbW/1Vth962C+Ni/iwo37QvMXY+ jVrHi6o1qvVArNiD8mDXOHZ5Pq07PGSNXTccSuJ4i5dwlN2kdXW+rOOyzsOGqOn6dY cCNV3KsxiL7c4DfVgKOWUfMtU6w5JZh6PjqzfcoZ8JmFZ0c9uanARNfFVV/te1CLhw DPy9c2pchYfwA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.55.41]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78F7B120268; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:40:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tuzdsj8d.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:30:26 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/14 14:40:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252243 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn [2020-06-14 18:30:26] wrote: > > This is mis-indented. It's not your fault, but I recommend you > > override the auto-indentation :-( > That would be a hassle for aggressive-indent-mode users (like me). Yes, it has downsides as well. That was just a recommendation. The better solution is to fix the auto-indentation, of course. > > Why autoloaded? > So that packages can add their function to that list. Fair enough. Please put this as a comment, then. > Ok, I have implemented a new repository-url VC command for all VC > systems I have installed and were able to test: Git, Hg, Bzr, and SVN. > Looks right? Looks great, thanks. (I expected that only the Git backend would be populated). "Basil L. Contovounesios" wrote: > Doesn't this need a non-nil NOERROR arg? I don't see why: if the backend doesn't implement the feature the front-end function will signal an error, so the callers need to be prepared to handle an error in any case. Stefan