From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU] New packages: avy-menu, flyspell-correct and friends Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y1z2i18m.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgjhwfjj.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1z0y1ob.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36677"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jai Flack Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 17 20:33:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nr20t-0009G1-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 20:33:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr20s-0007lR-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr202-0005PH-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr200-0005PT-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CAA7880722; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6804980342; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1652812366; bh=7x1AWbyCbOLRAXUx1P8Rf7Sx/uEa2VhxN59pvnLIank=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TXh1aVW1DVCsbFwAsXfLs3VN+Yvra3fnPQ6zDVFFPPN4vdz/g4pTCv5Cccav5YP46 men7ANV0lbOZe+DSNle60KENxLtNc0GeyOqB9Exi3KZCvKZ5U6TCZyomd7/hW1kn0B 1Aq79lcStP+PW3PQ3kyJMuBfdHO5JDPJ/uHIH9/pzbe/HbAT+1QOtSFqK3L/+IUFO5 ULEWimp+8sXJdaAWhrGnsDI0ga1tBkLJECabVpGeDkBgtxAD//qox2YpyBnNk0QpNA pzSYnVtIYSWo98ti9L8I+k9gRvLBtaUL9CTpYhL3UNl6o50ZEoxB47hjRsVHokO+du a1KAiySxFavOQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E3C7120790; Tue, 17 May 2022 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1z0y1ob.fsf@posteo.net> (Jai Flack's message of "Tue, 17 May 2022 08:59:48 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289867 Archived-At: > - flyspell-correct-avy-menu > - flyspell-correct-helm > - flyspell-correct-ido > - flyspell-correct-ivy > - flyspell-correct-popup > > These implement a simple `flyspell-correct-interface' for the given > package postfix. I think this goes back to the same question: Could you perhaps briefly explain what these packages do? Why the need for special helm, ido, ivy packages instead of using completing-read? -- Stefan