From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Splitting some erc tests Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wneag2zc.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30440"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 22:03:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ntakX-0007iF-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 22:03:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntakW-0006pR-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 16:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntags-0001oi-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntagp-0000Y7-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DF4D4442326; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F98744232B; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1653422368; bh=A1k5njWpMyizaG4w+2DOIPiqqEkLOMv3J/Tg1ygrwvA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EzJgGd9QaBwAWVbCSDo9a+SYZzY21qJlRSqTcv2A2bfUL1G2n2ifYMidPlYs5B4Xe EqgMKosMsGJUgdOwJKYCQkOd4I4zR32jpTXG3DVvhAUm5UOLVrOeGjYCvhWYHCiqfG 9zSnxLA9dfiDxVErUxbvs6nHmHhyInPNm5mTRY58547jzMATKckFl37HSfiapyLZVi ONWZ4cNF5Z1AxaiNkHmJvgsrTYTbZPIF4SysuLkb5WUcFRIsfWt20nt40fuqRaqFJs tqU2CqC+LbbC7MMIgvdsB/vyDeEXyzVbLLDHJdvdCXw2iZI4pULeJ877ML21U0/b4R 5BltZ/eYRdchA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF59A1207CC; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:59:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wneag2zc.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 24 May 2022 21:11:35 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290212 Archived-At: > The tests are supposed to be independent of each other, but are they > always in practice? My bet is that they aren't. But IIRC the tests aren't run in the order in which they appear in the file, so I suspect that in *most* cases they are indeed sufficiently independent for your parallelism use-case. And those that aren't should be fixed accordingly. Stefan