From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 3447e79f24 1/3: * lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el: Indent some rx constructs correctly. Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:46:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <165651655670.29289.7898006751120870045@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220629152917.18CFDC01686@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <875ykitml0.fsf@web.de> <4812556F-9A3A-4876-90FE-64B6F4341DE3@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="363"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 16:47:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6vSR-000ALv-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:47:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6vSP-0003lw-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6vRe-00033W-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:34380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6vRZ-0004OD-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 78D19100135; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:46:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F385100121; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:46:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1656600414; bh=P1GCzGjHRIXKQ/WC41RegW9dVlFLecqGw6cFrHtPwuU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hCl99FTJiCVtMAtcIG0nAOY3geyJG399V8cv1edCZ+rI9Kxqm6Y+yulaBbTB1H5Ww lhj/jOKvgN2Yawz1WWABVutmS0H0p4l/G1QHdGCVSDyg28GCgM389c8QgP4mLh4ptP tFssyYyqcpP+CWnyCTf7yYw8QeFcLgqSKI5GGF0JMKo2wYE0v/DHZmAOAlLNMkFb47 LW26Sbyg0uWMqBuXxkuWZ1o8zi93SWCYIj8MnfZGfjptgx1HBu/sXmIzV7mwTAOyX+ CAuUyQp+yEvB7BNiuoOBpRFrOoE0bfJrzS4CJmWiyhRYTuceG14oSQmUhi++KCuaVI VMG8lSHbDy4Lw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.196.165]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D061B120351; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:46:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4812556F-9A3A-4876-90FE-64B6F4341DE3@acm.org> ("Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd=22's?= message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:41:11 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291746 Archived-At: > I'm assuming that setting indentation properties on the other symbols, > `group-n`, `submatch-n`, `**` and `repeat`, is less objectionable. `group-n`, `submatch-n` sound specific enough, but the other two seem too generic to my gut-feeling, Stefan