From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/auctex cb0a1e6be1 72/77: Improve function calls to retrieve key=vals in style hooks Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <166154439039.10036.933483657788018296@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220826200639.2B668C00889@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87y1vavhw4.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3335"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Arash Esbati , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 26 23:17:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRghR-0000ga-Ia for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 23:17:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRghQ-0005h4-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRggF-0004zx-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRggD-0006xr-OD; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8270F44193E; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 38E6F441939; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1661548550; bh=jTtMtj5HYTDzkWtE97KYuOErayaQW4Czs5nkmi76k50=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=AvTfp+rBhEBM0NyL6UMDyouuVpLxV+Z8bhJFVGiv2IU9VLUWyH70ENVwi/5guj4FK E6xMBIcHr2Ca2GeE07wxM0B53qLH/2STRrNiTHj3aGhzfNnzfALqGsxSiguON6RX6W ZYsHgANghwUgIt1S/g3ORmTIYpVaxOVG3xQ1fCZcX2iXxEtGx+6aqBwc40sEbB/mZy /bOLgMgtsMZ8m/YnZT9ySEc3m6tPWBqXPIuPwWzXkgbhpSry9RfrMWCVfTFvXrGM7N 8hfdbFJtzkHsSmACXhXLUhqaeazokb3RduM0O6b5I9qqZhXWRq/x7ukRYd7uZ5fLXk zD1NB341EEiRg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.111]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13A48120423; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1vavhw4.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2022 22:47:47 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294165 Archived-At: > be just as good? I guess no because IIRC the context was that alist1 > and alist2 might be populated dynamically (by parsing the document) so > we need to take the values at the time the \bar macro is inserted. So > probably > > (TeX-add-style-hook > "foo" > (lambda () > (TeX-add-symbols > `("bar" (TeX-arg-key-val ,(lambda () (append alist1 alist2))))))) > > would be the right thing which works without eval, right? It's a bit > longer but I wouldn't mind. Wrapping code in a lambda to be evaluated > later is a common concept. FWIW, I don't understand exactly how the above code is "linked" to the definition of `TeX-arg-key-val` (which in my code takes two arguments rather than one). I tried to trace through the code, but it's a bit less obvious than needed for my little head. Stefan