From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] Build process stuck? Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:39:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7e1bb411-7f47-4c84-a710-537e594700a2@alphapapa.net> <7c90ba19-7616-4ec7-a87c-e0994ac08956@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 25 22:42:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ros5h-0007gL-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:42:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ros55-0006sv-E3; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ros4r-0006rE-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ros4l-0006vI-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A7D4B80ABE; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:41:47 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1711402906; bh=jZDIwTwHyNISzkAxSnthlD6+5pmnQsgz4NLHm6KSt3I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QYU47b6anp+TBPuDM5xZA+WlgAOhHf2pYBKEXIw8KL2A93WVK6BeyrIByVrNNYzPL n+3GEFupYNIKVRJf8xTkvwVUifUL6omvProaYQSNFlJQn8cGx9SOtvuCAtd77v+6oH /P9PmLX7UQclS+OpAQli9S+prVuzs8i+9rsH8KAV3oPaeYkTXN8MkCEnuiITDJEYLd h6m50h6W5WM/qKLEdkQLrOFLjv42Q+iAo4dhTzMZV8FQFoFQ4KTvrYG2xwjmYlRfbe 3wd+w3QQsZIa0+faygUPFwl4Jowh0rs4euh89Y4YEuBZc8dnHfDMngyzIBj2TqiTaS pfvmVKmI4F4QA== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57052808AF; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:41:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 487CA12026E; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:41:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7c90ba19-7616-4ec7-a87c-e0994ac08956@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:43:16 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317288 Archived-At: >>> And the latest commit on the configured release branch for ELPA is >>> b76e5cc1b3f1d1b7e67e72eb1a5d52058f45cf84, which is the one that updates the >>> version header to 0.8.1. >> The `listen` recipe is: >> (listen :url "https://github.com/alphapapa/listen.el" >> :doc "README.org") >> so there is no configured "release branch". > > *facepalm* I don't know how I made that mistake, especially so soon after > adding `activities' with `:release-branch "stable"' in its recipe. > > Is it safe to just add that to the `listen' recipe now so I can do that > going forward? Yes, of course. I just added it. I may even release 0.8.1 in a few hours. Stefan