From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'safety' compilation parameter Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Gerd =?windows-1252?Q?M=F6llmann?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 16:00:46 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s5Qnk-0009EA-T8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 16:00:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QnU-0007L1-UQ; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QnS-00079p-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QnQ-0004mQ-Ji; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A04084424AF; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1715349619; bh=9AAVGKsvm0BdEJ6CnA/sGS51n3YjQKUBNQm0tctRLFY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ATS4I4YVNWSjYvZ3e9TB9aG/B6RFHOSnB8vtQHVnS6E+AXYMwCojhBQoVlk0mdG3U jNhW4X3c52M04erwA30abeLWEGBaPfyq4DDMaXa0W9ZmK1xGXkD5fqT5MLnaCpNS3j PZrAKDVxFyzM1EdO4WGyVXgzC4ETZ1+R7Gce1iOcagYrZ0PONo+yZcHL4HtNThmUSs bbFFw4+lGq6UKiSV7oViPdxAoU8Kd5zByKVyYazMZgozaA00lkR34wnA57XJ4m3upB m+RSaZIGxg/7+d2qy6XXvDUE+Qpd+Q36ajBULvxZ28SW9s95r3obAIZ8DKIxR6ANVe rZT6c+k9xa7kg== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E869442496; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [10.35.239.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CFF0120475; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:00:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Fri, 10 May 2024 03:58:00 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319138 Archived-At: > After your hint I see now SBCL does that when: > > (or (>=safety 2) (>= safety speed 1)) [2] FWIW, I always thought that having both `safety` and `speed` was a form of overengineering which doesn't serve the users. Stefan