From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Occasional hangs in flyspell-mode and ispell-word Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080327052040.002826434E0@mt-computer.local> <47EC1142.6090902@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206816063 626 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2008 18:41:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Markus Triska To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 29 19:41:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jffzi-0001uq-6H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:41:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jffz6-0005lC-LC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jffz2-0005ie-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jffyy-0005es-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jffyy-0005en-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jffyy-0006se-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jffyy-00071A-3W for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jffyv-0006s4-5N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182] helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jffyu-0006rt-Ux for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:45 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAN4p7kfO+LLN/2dsb2JhbACBWqds X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,575,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="17131774" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2008 14:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.178.205]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id JVR96843; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9CD447F9E; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:40:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <47EC1142.6090902@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:27:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93824 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21774 Archived-At: >> I personally use an Emacs patched as follows: >> >> Index: src/process.c >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/src/process.c,v >> retrieving revision 1.538 >> diff -u -r1.538 process.c >> --- src/process.c 27 Mar 2008 20:52:24 -0000 1.538 >> +++ src/process.c 27 Mar 2008 20:52:32 -0000 >> @@ -4272,6 +4272,9 @@ >> FD_ZERO (&Connecting); >> #endif >> + if (time_limit == 0 && wait_proc && !NILP (Vinhibit_quit)) >> + error ("Blocking call to accept-process-output with quit inhibited!!"); >> + >> /* If wait_proc is a process to watch, set wait_channel accordingly. */ >> if (wait_proc != NULL) >> wait_channel = wait_proc->infd; >> >> so the accept-process-output refuses to do its job if it's run with >> quit-inhibited, which is the typical cause of problems such as the one >> you're describing. But your backtrace indicates that inhibit-quit is >> (most likely) not set, so your problem seems to be different. > It is a bit off topic but why do you not apply this to the CVS sources? It breaks some Elisp packages. Those packages arguably have a bug, but the bug may very rarely show up (if ever). Stefan