From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: CEDET sync Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86bpf7q3fc.wl%lluis@ginnungagap.pc.ac.upc.edu> <87wrxvyijr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B8C42E2.3080308@siege-engine.com> <7697A57B1AD9104F993CDF6A5B69430C09227D1F24@CORPMAIL08.corp.capgemini.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267543550 30031 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 15:25:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= , "Eric M. Ludlam" To: "Berndl\, Klaus" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 16:25:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmTyi-0005aN-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:25:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60517 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmTyi-0006EM-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmTyd-0006DR-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43862 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmTyY-0006Bm-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmTyY-0005Ld-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:21036 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmTyY-0005LY-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:25:34 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABO9jEvO+JkM/2dsb2JhbACbAnS/X4R7BIMXh3E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,567,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="57271241" Original-Received: from 206-248-153-12.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.153.12]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2010 10:25:33 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AEF83700A2; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:25:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7697A57B1AD9104F993CDF6A5B69430C09227D1F24@CORPMAIL08.corp.capgemini.com> (Klaus Berndl's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:58:00 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121543 Archived-At: > Supporting not only Emacs but also XEmacs should be a value upheld be > tools like CEDET and ECB, even when merged into Emacs. But cause of I think the issue of support for XEmacs is mostly orthogonal: we can and do include support for XEmacs in many of the bundled Emacs packages, and AFAICT none of the changes made when incorporating CEDET into Emacs should interect in any significant way with support for XEmacs. Stefan PS: As for XEmacs's demise: don't forget that Emacs was also considered as "heading south" around the Emacs-19 time frame. I wouldn't rule out the possibility of XEmacs (or some derivative) becoming the Emacs of choice 10 years from now.