From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction} Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <500D84B6.50303@yandex.ru> <500E2FB7.4080006@yandex.ru> <500E86F8.7090102@yandex.ru> <500FBEB2.7050302@yandex.ru> <5010D21D.9020505@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343345076 9655 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2012 23:24:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 27 01:24:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SuXQ3-0006Or-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:24:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuXQ3-0001xX-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuXQ0-0001xS-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuXPz-0007lr-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:45408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuXPz-0007lh-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6QNOTJY027249; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A9C2AECB1; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:24:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5010D21D.9020505@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:14:05 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4291=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4291> : streams <790672> : uri <1175903> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151896 Archived-At: >> If the excursion is made into a Lisp_Object (as a pseudovector of >> lisp_misc), then you don't need to have an `excursions' field in >> `struct buffer', save_excursion_save can just return the excursion >> object (i.e. the PVEC_EXCURSION in your code). > Argh, yes. Looks OK, thanks, Stefan