From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reachable killed buffers Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <504848D0.4020908@yandex.ru> <5048D826.3040103@yandex.ru> <5049C400.8070400@gmx.at> <504DB6DD.9030002@yandex.ru> <504E042E.5040100@yandex.ru> <504ECB49.4050509@yandex.ru> <50504349.7090603@gmx.at> <50509262.1070601@cs.ucla.edu> <50509533.9000502@yandex.ru> <50509698.5060108@cs.ucla.edu> <505098FB.1020801@gmx.at> <5050B151.2020304@yandex.ru> <5050CC93.3010506@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347506947 21893 80.91.229.3 (13 Sep 2012 03:29:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 05:29:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TC073-0000ih-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:29:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC070-0004GH-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC06y-0004G2-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC06x-0002LD-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:44846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC06x-0002L4-7v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:03 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FpYjU/2dsb2JhbABEDrQDgQiCFQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgcBboJkEQDozOBWIIwVQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="198220065" Original-Received: from 69-165-136-212.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.136.212]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Sep 2012 23:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 39FFE59445; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:29:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5050CC93.3010506@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:55:31 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153262 Archived-At: > This will keep killed buffers that happen to follow > an item on the list that is already marked for other > reasons. Shouldn't all the killed buffers be discarded? Arguably, if (part of) that list is shared with some other data structure, then we indeed shouldn't remove dead buffers from it. So I think the patch would be doing the right thing. Stefan