From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-functions do not honor common-lisp-indent-function Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87623rmtyy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356365935 7585 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2012 16:18:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 24 17:19:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TnAk7-0003RK-Qm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:19:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnAjt-0005cN-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnAjq-0005bR-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnAjp-0006Np-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:36543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnAjp-0006Nl-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:49 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLDj/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAScvIwULCzQSFBgNJIgcBboJkEQDiEKacYFYgwc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="210642364" Original-Received: from 69-196-176-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.176.227]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Dec 2012 11:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3FCA659067; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:18:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87623rmtyy.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:59:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155857 Archived-At: > Hi, some cl-functions are not indented correctly when > `lisp-indent-function' is set to `common-lisp-indent-function' > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (setq lisp-indent-function 'common-lisp-indent-function) > (defun foo () > (cl-flet ((test () > (ignore))) > (test))) > (defun foo () > (flet ((test () > (ignore))) > (test))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > is this wanted? No, but it's not a surprise either, since `cl-flet' is not defined in common-lisp ;-). Stefan