From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS updates proposal Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k3mw79iv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zjvr64lt.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87txly4ll9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ppwm3rcf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8738tc2mxz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87txls11un.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369446751 19941 80.91.229.3 (25 May 2013 01:52:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 01:52:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 03:52:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug3em-0006bB-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:52:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug3el-0003JF-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug3ee-0003Gb-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug3eZ-0006hc-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:10496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug3eZ-0006hW-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZoF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZoF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="14397844" Original-Received: from 69-165-154-5.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.165.154.5]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 May 2013 21:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 66D45AE439; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87txls11un.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 24 May 2013 17:53:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159781 Archived-At: > I am proposing that GnuTLS updates should be pushed out this way (which > would also cover installation, so the user doesn't have to get it from a > ZIP file on W32 or from God knows where on Mac OS X... Homebrew or Fink > or something else) instead of putting that responsibility on the user. That sounds OK so far. > We could use the GNU ELPA as the transport (once it has package > signing). I can be responsible for following the GnuTLS announcements. Now I lost you. How did we go from "gnutls" to "we"? Shouldn't some gnutls guys take care of that? Stefan