From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: Adding BBDB to Emacs core Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lgdpphmm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sh7mjd7d.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87lgddgaga.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87bme8b7u9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87lgdbz1p1.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1524675412 4538 195.159.176.226 (25 Apr 2018 16:56:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 18:56:48 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNio-00015Q-Sc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:56:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNkv-0003xR-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:58:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNib-0003fE-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNhX-00039U-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=41009 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNhW-00036Y-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNfM-0005n0-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:53:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:7T1rtwFKawoZGGxG8K6HOg3jkAg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224880 Archived-At: > More than I knew about. Replacing package.el would indeed be a way > forward (although you'd need to run both in parallel for a while). They're so close to each other that rather than replacing them, they need to be merged or modularized so that they build on top of each other. package.el is not nearly as constraining as people tend to think. Stefan