From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is FUNC in cl-callf not allowed to be an expression? Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 19:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874l631ek1.fsf@web.de> <87pnoqtuhm.fsf@web.de> <87r2961gox.fsf@web.de> <87mujohasa.fsf@web.de> <87a7fn3c6c.fsf@web.de> <875zqabh3t.fsf@web.de> <87zhnma11c.fsf@web.de> <871s0y3weo.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="207565"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 01:07:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSz-000rpf-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:07:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38056 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSy-0006MO-MH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSt-0006M4-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSr-0008Pu-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51716 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSr-0008KP-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPSm-000rXc-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:07:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:dFH52uRT+VeMQKf/Kglig749xPA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236604 Archived-At: > What do think now about `gv-place-let'? Does that look acceptable? The existence of both `gv-letplace` and `gv-place-let` is kind of problematic for the occasional user who'll struggle to remember which is which. So I think it needs a name which clarifies the difference. Stefan