From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A project-files implementation for Git projects Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:01:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8736h9rdc4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7bbjdwe.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7ba8uvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnk2zvvy.fsf@gnu.org> <838sqpx9eq.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2yow9dy.fsf@gnu.org> <838sqnw2na.fsf@gnu.org> <3007947f-f4eb-e3e8-8c14-1b372323aa1c@yandex.ru> <831rwfvzd6.fsf@gnu.org> <64bcedbf-d891-dcad-ac65-5719920f58e2@yandex.ru> <83k1a4tct2.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv97run8.fsf@gnu.org> <5ba04bf6-ed74-a18e-9074-5aa481ec3669@yandex.ru> <2c78a9ac-c535-bc18-8da8-30e121484929@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="10261"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 20 17:03:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iBKRf-0002RH-JF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:03:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60576 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iBKRd-0001Ns-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iBKQD-0001IX-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iBKQ8-00007t-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iBKQ5-0008Rq-Fd; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:02:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6DB04100BA0; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2126410096A; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:01:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1568991716; bh=nfB+6a/kYz+7pkZYwyBCZSRa75bpIwKvS6Vlsc+OSjA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZzZZ1otmVhjHAfrk9VMF5FKPoAUbmYTP2QUWApQdhPoWYAwpCVH7w6Op00IN9h982 8yMqMOzkv6HqvQt1q9znnKzVb6d8tZdCJSANMbm2xhUX73lgJ4lR2mLPhY+DD5Ek7m 29MXETKZ68y0l095UZFjoPcMNhC5EcCYwpQdBHzl5xOEME2+v6bTY9IVx40aQ+n2NI mJHWJpuuvXiUfgEC7TA+K9iT592ReOAL0Y5N1J1DDXx9iP7kiYrvWCrMnZ5eX4NzyQ 1Yr7ojTPaDEukU1I/Nse0vpi7MxpXSPdFACl1Gm/CZCF//AZkAAwzkIUuGKCpXF26t y4azA4TE4swEg== Original-Received: from pastel (76-10-182-129.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.182.129]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA8401207A2; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:01:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <2c78a9ac-c535-bc18-8da8-30e121484929@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:54:32 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240194 Archived-At: >> That's right: it wouldn't be 100% reliable. I don't think we want to go >> that way. > That would be for one application, not for the general facility, but I'm not > in a hurry to implement that, of course. Good, because this kind of code is better kept away from Emacs. The experience with file-notifications in auto-revert mode has been pretty poor, AFAIC: the implementation is fairly complex/fiddly, and the user-level behavior is only sometimes better (I often see the delay that comes from polling). Stefan