From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fixing url-unhex-string for unicode/multi-byte charsets Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:38:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20201106074742.jq3h4uujm7oce7af@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83wnyy9akw.fsf@gnu.org> <20201106102756.e2ctvpjruenatud5@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34730"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 15:38:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kb2t8-0008wv-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 15:38:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kb2t7-0005EW-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:38:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kb2sc-0004ml-47 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:24881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kb2sZ-0008Lg-U4; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:38:17 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1F51100267; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:38:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A7B9C10023D; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:38:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1604673488; bh=x3zb+Dh1HwtWxhyKJSilJNLzz0hwKCb2pd3ccYIjUAg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=owqOIvp7ubmFywL9+HJKMiIPhFu6fNrWG3wF9o6+v3VbJlOexdjg6i27F/SeG/UJg cG3KTJ73VdIWf8dTLlLcu/wuFbde/rT6jmO0PSM8ynN1QEd1LmQWS08G0LHEEzSGZt h8oWmjLQqnZr39WbVtechCzvchRjaKrQ7vS6RmeEl8NJN6dgYl49NLd+nK0TI44YSW c3YLbl9NxLS0h7snz2ArJetHLf7WhqBQvMjJQEpS20t8DKSTYk0q8mvjBW6LDUm1Qy 8ehodedYrCfWnTIvcjya4rw+JDKzDYIqwkpE/K0WktLiML0BkDK+XDpQsP4VZqwgJF yfP3YElHmLQLg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 373A8120066; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:38:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20201106102756.e2ctvpjruenatud5@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:27:56 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/06 08:56:47 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258819 Archived-At: >> I made a suggestion in that discussion, I will repeat some of them >> here: > Yeah, but they don't work. Could you try and figure out which part doesn't work as expected and in describe what way it fails (e.g. show the decoded result along with the expected result)? "Don't work" is not a very usable starting point to debug a problem, as we all know. Stefan