From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A whole lotta auto-saving going Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8735zdyly0.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2h1vyhq.fsf@gnus.org> <877dokq0fz.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2h0g0rk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14984"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , aaronjensen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 18:39:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyegH-0003km-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:39:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyegG-0005SB-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:39:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyefk-00051P-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:15686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyefj-0006Zo-5l; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:36 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B983B808C6; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6D2E180212; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610300312; bh=U5wqm7pXQBnJRwYEmHRYZZZR7NXGna+3YeIcw5Ezblw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=f2ZehNLfAeuPuiG/WAyqfxdNvAu9tC8gmdOW+jgghTU0WfFwrjBVW8e9CYOMcmurt bPa2ayWmE6LmDncrWs4kA6ottmGEjmONl0JX7ygWlI9uRja0JOxALp5ics6xcJ9ElT u99Uys9ZhmBAivipSCGwL8NCYYIunlEjywQdoM9P9kKnx3K/CEI0PvuBWn7+2LcBgP Wtr19bT/fl1Bz4ThKKDYMWcgsqN18shresnafHZqIBjCwEgCj/suExnAZwWvr3I3J2 nnB09lSz9Y0ThR03Nhvpx6b9MQnw8FEHOnDT5HSGI9BlUbWi2hdOoXXMoPbv50GY/P w/vb0gWReeqcA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 160571203D5; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:38:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83y2h0g0rk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:27:59 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262867 Archived-At: >> M-x shell RET >> make -j4 bootstrap RET >> C-f /tmp/some.el RET >> >> and then start typing away. Emacs then autosaves the some.el file every >> other keystroke. > > I guess the counter of non-menu events goes up very quickly, because > the subprocess produces a lot of output? >From what I can tell, in the recipe I used, the do-auto-save function is not called because of the number of non-menu events but because of the "idle timeout" (and indeed, AFAICT the process output does not generate any "events"). Stefan