From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83sg7mggls.fsf@gnu.org> <83czymc8nq.fsf@gnu.org> <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> <83eeirfqbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8hvscfi.fsf@gmail.com> <8335z7fmnz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft374axc.fsf@gmail.com> <5cb6a0ac-9fe9-bfc2-5642-3423bd043238@dasyatidae.com> <8735z748p1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2gz2pxf.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2gzdx4o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39488"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , rtt@dasyatidae.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 21:56:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kz4EW-000AAw-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:56:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz4EV-0006Zc-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz4Dw-00069l-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:14515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz4Du-00052E-Or; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:36 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 15064805F3; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D02A88021A; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:27 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610398527; bh=oNBNlhocY11SvK2V2/Pzek47NyT/2jKjk+t16ro7uKs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Lkjs+Gv6GRxegtXVWDBwNJdkMEwc441aA/3rwy41XHpq0gxz09DzrNX7/yQTsnyqh 1RR4Z2yQGcCwTGR39rPpdlj87SwrFkb2AHrKRUdMXN2hg41ckoCXRyjmeh1QXjEP38 luFeHIlCd51azBgR5xFg2j2mQPYDrC6tC00gjnbTw29UPFQREOKe9tr8Ijjsg1zYeO 6SZQBv980QPAJ3nRjcHWv14CbhdOUfKzL0J5b7yIRYW9P3iLmcGb5FiKe3ubIU9uCd NAZh7n+q8EVyHudPU8Yw6l/4a+6cLdawnnR2PnR9OKNki9Wpcqn4xwWSFkEjCZDZoA ZE5GnM1SaUgrA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 969CF120154; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:55:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83y2gzdx4o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:41:43 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262935 Archived-At: >> I guess that=CA=BCs possible. I=CA=BCve now found the actual patch. If E= li >> thinks it=CA=BCs worth persuing, I can make it conditional, unless someo= ne >> wants to spare me the trouble of setting up a working Windows dev >> environment :-). > > My main concern is who will investigate the bug reports about this, > debug the problem, find fixes, etc.? Indeed, since Robert (luckily) doesn't use Windows (any more?), we'd need to find someone else to take responsibility for the patch. > If you or Stefan or someone else volunteers, then please go ahead. Don't count on me with Windows code, no. Stefan