From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [davidsmith@acm.org: [patch] url-hexify-string does not follow W3C spec] Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:20:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <44CDDF7A.8060404@gnu.org> <87lkq9ivgf.fsf@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154406084 25453 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2006 04:21:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 04:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Smith , Thien-Thi Nguyen , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 06:21:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7lkt-0003cV-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:21:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7lks-0003Wl-BD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7lkU-0003TM-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:20:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7lkS-0003St-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7lkS-0003Sp-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7lnD-0006IM-U8; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.146.253]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060801042048.WUUZ10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C83797ED3; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:55:44 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57906 Archived-At: > * Rev 1.14 > The argument is assumed to be either a sequence of characters or a > sequence of octets depending on the multibyteness of the string. > Incompatibility still remains for a multibyte string containing > eight-bit-control or eight-bit-graphic, but usually negligible. What incompatibility? If the string only contains ASCII and eight-bit-*, then encoding it with utf-8 will return the same string of bytes (except in a unibyte string rather than multibyte string). Stefan