From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: alinsoar@voila.fr
Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: REDO ?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:38:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvabwzrtnq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23364436.370611177321482768.JavaMail.www@wwinf4203> (A. Soare's message of "Mon\, 23 Apr 2007 11\:44\:42 +0200 \(CEST\)")
> Logically in this moment the redo should be done by a negative
> argument. But:
> a
> b
> c
> C-/ => Undo!
> a
> b
> Now it should be possible to apply a redo.
> M-- M-1 C-/ => Undo!
That might be a good addition, indeed.
> This would be good if it possible to implement it. I meant to see in the
> minibuffer after applying an undo or a redo the text after applying next
> an undo and the text after applying next a redo...
Sounds very difficult. Maybe we could simply highlight the newly
modified text somehow.
And maybe we could additionally provide a "undo-slow" that would first
highlight the about-to-changed text, then wait a short little while, then
perform the undo and highlight the new text (and maybe even highlight the
"next text to be undone").
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-23 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 9:44 REDO ? A Soare
2007-04-23 15:38 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2007-04-23 23:08 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-23 23:54 ` Davis Herring
2007-04-23 23:08 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-24 9:28 A Soare
2007-04-24 13:32 ` Drew Adams
2007-04-23 15:46 A Soare
2007-04-23 17:09 ` David Reitter
2007-04-23 18:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-23 20:01 ` Ken Manheimer
2007-04-23 20:16 ` Davis Herring
2007-04-24 16:03 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-24 16:21 ` David Reitter
2007-04-25 2:04 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-21 19:54 A Soare
2007-04-23 1:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-23 14:21 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-23 14:30 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-24 16:03 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvabwzrtnq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=alinsoar@voila.fr \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).