From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uninformative comment in files.el Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <475EF93E.3060203@ig.com.br> <475F0992.2030307@gmx.at> <475F45EB.2070704@ig.com.br> <476084A9.4010800@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198371492 30800 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2007 00:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 23 01:58:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J6FAd-0002Mn-KK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:58:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J6FAJ-0003QQ-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J6FAF-0003PG-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J6FAE-0003O3-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J6FAE-0003Ni-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:58 -0500 Original-Received: from zue-tix-bbcs-dynip-162-001.vtx.ch ([83.228.162.1] helo=ceviche.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J6FAB-0003so-4y; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 22727B40F3; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:57:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:49:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85394 Archived-At: > Thus, I guess it is better not to alter anything about the mark. Agreed. It should be deactivated, of course, but the buffer-modification should take care of that. Stefan