From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay - very long lines Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3FEE1ADD-7471-4EA4-AE55-9175C9218B6E@gmail.com> <4AC07B50-75B6-4A68-9E01-A228BA64BDAE@gmail.com> <7787DC68-9126-47F1-B3E9-1626FEAD46FB@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234986313 19191 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2009 19:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 20:46:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZsNB-0002iC-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:46:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZsLr-0007gI-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZsLn-0007fz-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZsLi-0007fa-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55171 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZsLi-0007fX-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:33444) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZsLh-0003yT-1E; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:49 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-136.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.136]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n1IJih5i015707; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:43 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 600B2A2261; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:47:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3214=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109194 Archived-At: >> We're proposing to stop processing a buffer line when we have left >> the portion of the buffer that is currently visible in the window. > I think Emacs already does that, but I might be mistaken. If it does, then the performance issue is elsewhere. Stefan