* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS [not found] <E1PBkET-0004td-NR@eggs.gnu.org> @ 2010-10-29 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii 2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris 2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-10-29 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-devel > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:18:22 -0400 > From: emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org > > revno: 102145 > committer: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> > branch nick: trunk > timestamp: Fri 2010-10-29 00:04:09 -0700 > message: > Sync docs of some X, W32, NS C functions. > > * src/nsfns.m (Fx-display-save-under, Fx-open-connection) > (Fxw-color-defined-p, Fxw-display-color-p, Fx-show-tip): > * src/w32fns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection): > * src/xfns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection): > Sync docs between X, W32, NS. > modified: > src/ChangeLog > src/nsfns.m > src/w32fns.c > src/xfns.c > -------------- next part -------------- > === modified file 'src/ChangeLog' > --- a/src/ChangeLog 2010-10-29 03:29:29 +0000 > +++ b/src/ChangeLog 2010-10-29 07:04:09 +0000 > @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ > 2010-10-29 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> > > + * nsfns.m (Fx-display-save-under, Fx-open-connection) > + (Fxw-color-defined-p, Fxw-display-color-p, Fx-show-tip): > + * w32fns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection): > + * xfns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection): > + Sync docs between X, W32, NS. > + I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of these functions, with most of their bodies in separate functions that live in platform-specific files. Then the doc string would be in only one place, which I think will deliver us from the need to go through this pain in the future. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS 2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris 2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Glenn Morris @ 2010-10-29 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of > these functions, with most of their bodies in separate functions that > live in platform-specific files. Then the doc string would be in only > one place, which I think will deliver us from the need to go through > this pain in the future. Absolutely something like that would be better. (The doc-strings will still need to be unified, so the current changes are a small step in the right direction.) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS 2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii 2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris @ 2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2010-10-29 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of I don't wonder. I know it to be the case (and have said so in this list a few times already). Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-29 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1PBkET-0004td-NR@eggs.gnu.org>
2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris
2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).