From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: Completing with anything Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:47:06 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87r5bhysp6.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87vd0romky.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87mxm2na63.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87vd0qfhu3.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87y63jpii5.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <871v0ecwe4.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87aaecihl2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306241244 17676 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2011 12:47:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Antoine Levitt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 14:47:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr12-0001AO-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:47:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr0z-0005E1-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr0w-0005Dj-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr0v-0007Jw-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr0v-0007Js-AI; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:45945 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOr0u-0003HP-SC; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D8023662FB; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:47:06 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <87aaecihl2.fsf@gmail.com> (Antoine Levitt's message of "Tue, 24 May 2011 11:16:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139676 gmane.emacs.orgmode:42182 Archived-At: > So, could you add 'failed, which means that no function was able to > complete? That way I could do something like > (setq completion-extra-properties '(:exit-function my-exit-function)) > (defun my-exit-function (string finished) > (when (eq finished 'failed) > (dabbrev-expand))) > and always get a dabbrev-expand as fallback to completion-at-point? Hmm... interesting way to attack that problem. I don't think that will work quite like this: if the completion provides its own :exit-function (e.g. to add a terminator string), then yours won't be run. Stefan