From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc/emacs/mule.texi questions Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1md37ayv3b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <873983rdrg.fsf@gnu.org> <2vpqb7pog8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334785668 29115 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2012 21:47:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jason Rumney To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 18 23:47:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKcj4-0001oS-L2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:47:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKcj3-0005lr-U3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKcj0-0005lg-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKciz-0008ON-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:48901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKcit-0008Lw-QA; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q3ILlWdm007079; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 18EE7AE177; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:47:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:34:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4196=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4196> : streams <747996> : uri <1100698> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149787 Archived-At: >>> Many things related to unibyte were declared obsolete. >>> Should the "unibyte: t" spec be another? >> Yes. > What is the replacement? Nothing, coding:, something else? "coding: binary". Stefan